1.What is the difference between static stress and fluctuating stress in machine design?
| Parameter | Static Stress | Fluctuating Stress |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Stress that remains constant with time. | Stress that varies with time (changes in magnitude and sign). |
| Load Type | Steady, unchanging load. | Repeated, alternating, or cyclic load. |
| Failure Type | Produces immediate or static failure. | Causes fatigue failure over time. |
| Design Basis | Yield strength (Sy). | Endurance limit (Se), fatigue theories. |
| Examples | Columns under constant load, beams with static weight. | Rotating shafts, connecting rods, springs. |
2.Types of Dynamic / Fluctuating Stresses ?
| Type of Stress | Definition | Stress Range | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluctuating Stress | Stress varies between two unequal values. | σmin to σmax (both ≠ in magnitude) | Shaft with variable torque |
| Completely Reversed Stress | Stress changes from equal tension to equal compression. | +σ to –σ | Rotating beam test |
| Alternating Stress | Stress varies symmetrically between +σ and –σ; used in fatigue. | +σa to –σa | Fatigue analysis of rods |
| Repeated Stress | Stress varies between zero and a maximum value. | 0 to +σ | Springs in machines |
| Variable Stress | Stress changes continuously with time due to varying load. | Irregular | Machine components under dynamic load |
3.S–N Curve (Wöhler Curve) ?
- The S–N curve shows the relationship between stress amplitude (S) and number of cycles to failure (N) during fatigue loading.
- As stress decreases, the number of cycles to failure increases.
- Used for predicting fatigue life of components.
Types of S–N Curves
| Type of S–N Curve | Definition | Materials | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finite Life Curve | Shows failure at high stresses within limited cycles. | Most materials | Steep drop in life as stress increases. |
| Endurance Limit Curve | Curve becomes horizontal after a point; below this stress, failure won’t occur. | Ferrous materials (steel) | Has endurance limit (Se). |
| No Endurance Limit Curve | No horizontal region; failure occurs at any stress if cycles are high enough. | Non-ferrous materials (Al, Cu) | Only fatigue strength at specific cycles. |
| Low Cycle Fatigue Curve | Represents high stress + low cycles (<10⁴). | Heavy load components | Plastic deformation dominates. |
| High Cycle Fatigue Curve | Represents low stress + high cycles (>10⁴–10⁶). | Steel, Aluminum | Elastic deformation dominates. |
4.Fatigue Failure Theories ?
| Theory / Criterion | Description | Used For | Nature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soderberg Line | Very safe; uses yield strength with endurance limit. | Ductile materials, conservative design. | Linear & most conservative. |
| Goodman Line | Uses ultimate strength with endurance limit. | General fatigue design. | Linear; less conservative than Soderberg. |
| Gerber Curve | Uses a parabolic curve between endurance limit and ultimate strength. | Ductile materials under fluctuating loads. | Nonlinear; more accurate, less conservative. |
| ASME Elliptic Theory | Combines shear, yield, and endurance limits in elliptical form. | Shafts & machine members. | Moderate conservatism, realistic. |
| Modified Goodman | Similar to Goodman but includes factor of safety. | General purpose, safer than Goodman. | Linear with safety factor. |
| Goodman–Soderberg Comparison | Not a theory, but used to compare how conservative each is. | Design selection. | Soderberg < Goodman < Gerber (conservative → less conservative). |
